Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 26.06.2025 06:10
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Webb Captures a Cosmic Forest of Ancient Galaxies - PetaPixel
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Do liberals realise that God, who is much more powerful than them, is on the side of Trump?
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
What is the degree of influence of Saudi Wahhabism on the modern Muslim world?
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
How do I convince flat earthers that the earth is round?
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Michaels acquires Joann’s intellectual property, private label brands - WSB-TV
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Rory McIlroy makes an 8, barely breaks 80 in missing cut at RBC Canadian Open - NBC Sports
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
What’s next?
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Thank you.